Doctor of slander and master of sockpuppetry Jeromy Visser claims that his is the only genuine Christian Identity ministry and that he is the only genuine Christian Identity pastor. He doesn’t actually believe these claims. He’s crazy but he’s not that crazy. However, he knows that if he can convince enough of the more gullible members of the CI community that he is Yahweh’s nearest and dearest preacher, he’ll be able to put Uber Eats on speed dial.
Visser’s go-to Scripture for establishing—or attempting to establish—his DSCI (Dual-Seedline Christian Identity) bona fides is 1 Timothy 3:2, A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach. I’ve highlighted the first part of the verse because that’s the only part Visser ever quotes. While he might meet the husband-of-one-wife requirement, he doesn’t meet the others, so he simply ignores them, as well as those in verses three to seven of the same chapter. Only someone unaware of Visser’s often sexually florid trash-talking—he once threatened to baptize me in his semen—or foolish enough to overlook it in the unscriptural belief that expounding the CI message cleanses the expounder of all sin could possibly think he meets the good behavior requirement. To be a blameless bishop, one must meet all the requirements. Yahweh doesn’t give us the option of cherry picking them.
Christian Identists [read: Christians] who fall afoul of Visser can expect to be called falsely Jews, pedophiles, homosexuals, and entrapment-loving FBI agents not just by the “Blameless Bishop” himself but by a legion of web-based detractors who will suddenly appear out of nowhere, employing the exact same obloquy as he.
Ray Bunzow, a Christian Identity pastor, experienced this curious phenomenon after he inherited the late Pastor James Wickstrom’s ministry, which Visser insisted had been bequeathed to him. Bunzow documents his hassles with Visser in this video.
Such was Visser’s hissy fitting over losing out on “Wick’s” potentially money-spinning ministry that he concocted a news article “verifying” Bunzow’s alleged (by Visser) predilection for kiddy fiddling. The URL in the image below, which points out that this is Bunzow’s third sodomy charge, leads to “proof” in the form of an error message. Note that the “reporter” goes out of his way to stress that it was Bunzow alone who “destroyed” Wickstrom’s ministry. You can count on Scoop Visser to cover the waterfront.
Now, how do I know for certain that Visser posted the “article”? Because no one but Visser and his multiple online personalities, all of whom use the same syntax and phraseology, have ever accused Bunzow of being a pedophile.
What does the Bible have to say about liars?
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
What does the Bible have to say about slanderers?
An hypocrite with his mouth destroyeth his neighbour: but through knowledge shall the just be delivered
What does the Bible have to say about deceivers?
He who works deceit shall not dwell within my house; He who tells lies shall not continue in my presence.
Would a biblically approved bishop lie, slander, and deceive as if it were as standard a practice to him as drawing breath? Nod your head with alacrity if you’re Pastor Jeromy Visser.
I guested on an episode of Jonathan Machtemes’ Obry Projekt. After the show, the “Blameless Bishop” stormed the comments section under a couple of different names including, incredibly, that of the man he swears is a pedophile, and demonstrated why his CI ministry is the only one worthy of your time and money. But especially your money.
Visser is referring here to my old avatar image, which is of me as a 12-year-old. He knows it’s a pic of me because years ago, when I had the appalling misfortune of co-hosting a podcast with him, I told him it was. Apparently I am the only “pedophile” in history who molests himself.
The topic of discussion for the show was the abduction and in many cases murder of white men in wilderness and urban areas of the United States and elsewhere in the world. I theorized that the Jews were the likeliest culprits. Visser theorized that Yahweh was.
In that last screenshot, Visser disavows CI, but in this next one, taken of a post on his forum, declares his love for it. Hey, it’s a double-minded man’s right to change his mind.
Two thirds of the people who post on Visser’s forum are in fact Visser. This goes for most of the forum’s regulars, such as K-2, seedliner, Joe, and BUZZBOMB. These fabricated chips off the old block serve two purposes. First, they enable him to dupe the unwitting into thinking he has plenty of corroboration for his slander and thus must be telling the truth. And second, they give prospective tithers the impression his forum is a happening hangout where fellowship and validation abound.
In the next series of screenshots, Visser, posting as himself and then not as himself, achieves comedy glory with some alternating assessments of his “best friend”.
Visser loves Wickstrom.
Visser loves Wickstrom not.
Visser is partly motivated by his love of money and loathing of work. When his coffer starts to run low, he’ll compel his followers to refill it by threatening to expunge his forum or stop “Godcasting”, or he’ll rebuke them for being tightfisted bastards. (Serves the tightfisted bastards right if you ask me.) He’s even been known to creatively reinterpret Scripture to boost his cash reserves. Yahweh doesn’t mind, though, because he’s married with children.
But when all else fails, Visser will dial up the shame-and-pity meter until the mechanism explodes with a resounding BOIIIING!
There’s also a genetic driving force behind Visser’s misdeeds. One need only glance at a happy snap of the bloke to see that diversity enriches his DNA.
With his sky-high cheekbones, strung-out eye sockets, and swept-back cranium, the Dirty South’s Most Blameless Bishop would fit right in playing Jew’s harp at a Hittite hootenanny. This fact alone excludes him from holding any form of Christian office, for not only must a bishop be blameless, he must also be white.